Suddenly a news report comes out that surprises everyone. The person who is Trump’s closest ally, his right-hand man, and arguably the most important figure in America’s decision to attack Iran, is this very gentleman, Senator Lindsey Graham.
Everyone knows he even advocated for a nuclear strike on Iran, arguing that since we won World War II by dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, we should do the same to Iran. And now, he suddenly passes away. The announcement doesn’t specify whether he suffered a heart attack, a brain hemorrhage, or what exactly happened. Instead, the press release simply states that he died after briefing Trump.
He had been posting on social media just one or two days ago, including on X. He was also appearing in the media before that, so what kind of briefing could have caused this? Alongside this news comes another report about the passing of another major figure. The former Emir of Qatar, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, has passed away at the age of 74.
These are two completely different events; one is a former Emir of Qatar who has died, while Graham’s death was sudden and unexplained. So people on American social media— which I’ve been using lately to gauge public opinion— some are asking if this is some kind of foul play. That’s all there is to it; obviously, I have no evidence. America keeps getting dragged into war, and Trump repeatedly brings war to the forefront.
But then suddenly, war breaks out again, and now Iran has responded harshly. Specifically, Speaker of Parliament Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf states: “The era of one-sided deals is over. We told you keep your word or pay the price. Reality is knocking.” This is serious.
This is a threat of results from Iran’s Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf. And he is sharing point number five of the MOU because the issue has been created. Trump is pressuring the Strait of Hormuz to make Iran back down and let us extract oil from there. Which also reveals their ill intentions, but Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf shares this point.
Point number five says that upon signing this MOU. The Islamic Republic of Iran will make arrangements using its best efforts. For the safe passage of commercial vessels without charging for sixty days only. For sixty days, Iran will arrange for all the vessels to pass through safely.
Both coming and going — this was placed on Iran through the MOU. Trump is now doing nonsense by saying the MOU should go. To hell with it; I’ve already thrown it into hell. Even the ceasefire is over.
And whatever is happening in the Strait of Hormuz now, we will do as we please there. Let the oil flow, and from this we understand their ill intentions that the analyst says about the situation is that those who are dot-connecting it, the point is that they want to extract as much oil as possible from here; if Iran acts according to its will the speed does slow down a bit because of their checks on everything, since they mean that they pass through every vessel, but you have to register with them; you have to deal with them and conduct transactions with them. Yes, we have to pass through this corridor and that one at such a time. The corridor is quite narrow, so perhaps only one shift will pass through there at a time.
We want as many shifts as possible without any
The reason they were able to pass through here is because Iran’s deputy sorry, America’s Vice President—has stated on record that, look, One reason for this MOU was that our oil reserves had decreased and the Western countries couldn’t replenish them again the oil prices had been kept very stable, and we were able to fulfill that at least, and our missile defense system was rebuilt because quite a bit of damage had been done to it by Iran, such as the early warning radar system installed in Qatar, which was completely destroyed; this is what they call repairing it again, rebuilding it— it takes two or three years for that, so they need an early warning radar system in the nearby area, and besides that, they also need a missile defense shield, Patriot missiles, and all of America’s defense shields; Netanyahu also needed them for his own purposes, while Ukraine faced trouble because their Patriots ran out, and Russia was launching missile attacks there. Due to the greater scarcity, overall all these issues have arisen. This MOU was just a pretext for them to refill all their stocks again. Iran is standing as an obstacle in their way, so Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said that now you will have to face reality.
Reality is knocking, meaning clearly Iran will respond. will respond. And this Senator Lindsey Graham always kept whispering in Trump’s ears: “strike them, do this, do that.” and this deal was also not in his favor, so after his death will there be any change in Trump’s thinking because the American media the little bit that is being reported about them is this that for the past two decades, meaning twenty years to twenty-five years, America’s foreign policy has, by and large, been shaped by this man’s input. All of its Middle Eastern wars have been driven by his input.
Look, if you see this person’s role somewhere or another. You will notice a very significant role because Netanyahu’s government posts that their biggest ally in America has now passed away from this world, so there will be an impact. Personalities also carry a lot of weight; you can see it now among my fellow Pakistanis. On one hand, we have this situation, and on the other, this news comes out about journalist Shahid.
Maitla writes that the attacks by PML-N’s establishment-linked journalists the attacks on policies have intensified, and there will be more severity; they have realized that our hefty “tea-and-water” perks and monthly honoraria the day is coming to an end, now regarding Shahid Maitla, what I understand is that they have remained very close to the establishment. After Bajwa stepped down from power and retired, the first interview he gave was about this matter. —that so-called statement he gave—was given to this very same Shahid Maitla. If I remember correctly, he published the entire story. That Bajwa takes oaths saying, “I will say this about Imran Khan.”.
He is not speaking truthfully, or perhaps things are being presented differently, or something along those lines. but it was probably Maitla whom Bajwa Either he contacted Bajwa or Bajwa contacted him first, and then that file… What was there, they are saying the same thing now that PML-N has realized that their days are numbered; on the other hand, another thing comes to light. My instinct says yes, that Fawad Chaudhry who is sitting in the middle without any support and I had told you about his maximum reach which is
Up to the third or fourth level of military leadership; he does not have influence up to the top. Fawad Chaudhry responds by saying that even Abu Bakr might not fully know—maybe he doesn’t know what Abu Bakr said. I don’t know the background, but they say our friend Abu Bakr is… and Munib Farooq are making a similarly superficial analysis; both are saying… That one side has gone completely silent—meaning, apparently, that Abu Bakr said something like…
Imran Khan will have to accept that the people are with him, and Munib Farooq is saying that the whole army’s will shall prevail, not Imran Khan’s; no one will talk to them; such statements should not be entertained. Fawad Chaudhry says that our friends Abu Bakr and Munib Farooq is giving a superficial analysis; both are saying that one It doesn’t happen that one side lies down completely and accepts the other is entirely right. In a conversation, sometimes one person’s points are accepted while the other’s are not. If the solution is based on belittling the other side, then who will accept it?
A country cannot run without the army, Without [the people], there can be no state, and without inclusion, there can be none either. Both sides’ importance is key, so such hardline perspectives are not viable. For four years, they have sunk the country’s ship and ruined the livelihood of some people. Things are moving with strictness, but the country’s fate is sealed; we can only try our best.
Let us accept it if we must; otherwise, whatever is happening will continue to happen. But for how long? Basically, the military has brought in a new strategy or plan. The most likely scenario is that minus Imran, minus Imran.
Imran Khan will be out of politics; you may be temporarily out, but once the army agrees… PTI will return to power again, and then your path will also clear. No one else… I am only giving my own analysis that this is the kind of game the military always plays.
The military always ignites such games; it is evident that there is a middle path for the army. The army’s only condition is that we must not accept Imran Khan. For the army, the middle path is this: we do not accept Imran Khan. And here, Munib Farooq himself reveals that he is very fond of Barrister Gohar; the army holds him in great respect—the army chief himself deeply respects Barrister Gohar.
So from this you can gauge that Barrister Gohar is respected, but Imran Khan is not acceptable. If not, then why not try to minus Imran? That’s what I’m saying.
Now, since all these developments have taken place, I want to tell you about Aleema Khan—rather, I want to share this clip of hers. That’s what Aleema Khan is saying; she had to come out into the field herself. And that’s what she’s saying—listen to her response regarding this matter.
So, what is her response about this issue? You speak when you are in a position of power, you to them are not begging for water, saying they don’t even have anything in their own hands have you seen your MNAs and MPs? We just I will teach you so this begging for talks coming from PTI’s core the leadership of PTI has repeatedly said, “Let us talk about it” We are doing this, they are saying, “Talk about it,” but the position is from strength; first show your ground power
Look, after the November 26th massacre, you all went and sat back in your homes—All of them, and then you said, “Okay, we won’t be coming out because” “They’ll shoot us, so we’re not going out.” You said that. Now that you’ve said this, basically a politician’s only strength is the public; if he says, “I don’t even want to use the people’s power,” If you don’t want to use it, then after that, your leverage is gone. After that, there’s no leverage left, so how can you negotiate? One way or another, if you negotiate as a party, you’ll have to give up everything.
It has to be handed over to the military, and the fundamental thing behind handing it over is minus Imran Khan; the issue is that PTI’s core leadership doesn’t care whether he’s removed or not. So what happens? We all wish, brother, that one of us will become prime minister, someone will become prime minister—it’s their delusion that they’ll remove Imran Khan and then someone someone will become PM—anyway.
So Aleema Khan made one point, and secondly, Aleema Khan too—I’ll try to play it for you—regarding the 5 August call PTI has given, for one day. On that, What do you say about this? Listen, August has come, and we have just heard it. A call has been given for the fifth of August; it’s a call for August itself.
But we tell PTI that this is not a one-day call. You should not have issued a one-day call; you didn’t put enough pressure on Imran Khan that he should get his treatment done Imran Khan initially said to end his isolation, which is when Imran Khan’s crime was that we just heard the call was given for the fifth date and Aleema Khan says you shouldn’t have issued a one-day call; What kind of one-day call is this? They had already rejected it outright because they know these are lollipops.
See, until a movement doesn’t start, until there isn’t a street movement, until the public isn’t stood up on their own feet again, look at history: It happens that sometimes things become very harsh; A dictator comes and does a lot of killing, but if if you sit in hiding, the dictator will rule silently by his own choice. The government will rule; this time the difference should be that Zia-ul-Haq couldn’t rule for eleven years. Ayub Khan couldn’t rule for eleven years either; the difference should be that the public stands up and says, “Your father’s country isn’t yours,” so you can’t just come here and rule for ten or fifteen years. It won’t be like that; we won’t give it to them.
Our country belongs to us, and we will run it by our own choice. This is a matter of principle, Aleema Khan is talking about principles, but criticism is being directed at her. I am watching as Azad Kashmir Trump Stops Attack on Iran || Pakistan New Defence Deal">Ali Muhammad Khan has posted from his account that dynastic politics is not acceptable to us. And the reason he put it this way is: “I have been in politics since 2013, since 2011, and I have not brought a single family member in”—whereas dynastic politics is what they practice.
Well, this is a very cleverly crafted narrative, spun to claim this and that—namely, that: Aleema Khan wants to join Imran Khan’s party first, according to the initial narrative. The story was that Bushra Bibi and Aleema Khan were fighting, with Bushra Bibi… being kept out because she was meant to control the party, but…
Aleema Khan had her put in jail so that she wouldn’t be able to control the party. These kinds of claims are all part of the narrative. Brother, if the army is heeding Bushra Bibi and also heeding Aleema Khan, then they would let the two fight it out; the party would get ruined.
So these are all just stories. Aleema Khan is out in the field only out of compulsion; she is standing outside because the party has basically laid down its arms. It would sound strange if I say that they have surrendered. The greatest surrender in human history, where so much has happened.
When the army surrendered in numbers, it was Pakistan’s military of 1971. It’s a surrender of the century; in human history, never has such a large army laid down its arms. There is no example in history of ninety thousand whether they were ninety thousand or ninety-nine thousand, and they have surrendered their weapons, but then the next big surrender that is visible is of PTI. There will be no example like this in human history.
That twenty crore out of your twenty-five crore people are standing with you. We support you; you know this, and you also know that all institutions… Within that, seventy percent of people support you, but you surrender and say that we can’t do anything anymore. They can’t do it; they just shoot and watch the negotiations unfold.
If any situation arises, it does so for the sake of the country, for the sake of the country. If the army were to falter, this would be the state of the nation today—this is how things would stand. Just thinking about it makes me feel like this is the second major surrender that has happened now, my fellow Pakistanis, you are watching on my channel, and since there is no one more kind than this, I have decided to say I will also do a video on the channel about searching for the truth in the news. If it’s important, what will I do with the news?
Otherwise, it’s historical. Events like these will also be discussed and connected to Pakistan. We will also try to expand this channel a bit. If we try to do that, then my channel which is searching for the truth should be subscribed to as much as possible so that there too we can connect it because they have already put this channel in the grinder of the firewall put it in.
It was already banned before, and now they are really pulverizing it— they have started using some algorithm like that, and many social media companies in America, for example… You I want to tell everyone that the new TikTok account which you have all followed and honored me with, now the TikTok authorities have raised a new objection against my own account. They are saying that I am impressing someone else on my account, but I myself shared my ID with them. I told them, “Brother, this is me,” but they rejected the appeal.
Do it again on a new account; they say you’re someone else’s. Use the account now, some other friends have done it in my name on Jee. They’ve created accounts; someone has a lakh followers on TikTok. on TikTok; some have a hundred and fifty thousand, some sixty thousand.
So I I request that you please follow TikTok’s policy. You are using my content, and I have no issue with that.
Okay, but use the policy and there are two or three things in it.
You can write about Waqar Malik; you didn’t write his name properly. It’s okay, you can write Waqar Malik’s fan account or comment account. Or you can also write a comment account, so you can use it, but if you use the main name, then obviously I will appeal and then your account when I will get it reinstated, and I feel that God willing, one day they will do it again because they have put me on the recommended list but there is no account, yet even the recommendation is not being processed, so if I reinstate my account then your account will get restricted in this way, so it’s better that if you are watching my video and downloading it to post the full video yourself and you are posting the entire video as well along with your account, write “Waqar Malik Fan” or “Waqar Malik Commentary.” This way, this clarification will be done, okay? You know that I…
Who am talking to you, are you understanding this thing so that it… The confusion and complication should end, and yours too. Your account is clearly visible as you have uploaded videos and downloaded them. Your hard work should not go to waste; otherwise, your the account that has been struck or copyrighted can also be deleted, which is obvious because if my own account gets banned and I provide proof, it could automatically happen.
If your account is closed, take care of it. Write Waqar Malik Fan along with it or write Waqar Malik Commentary, okay? Yes, this is very important because something like this happened to my main account. My previous account on TikTok was banned, and they also claimed that I was impersonating someone, and the new one I had created was also banned.
So my old account, which had around twenty-four to twenty-seven thousand followers, I have transferred it to Waqar Malik’s commentary so that it doesn’t clash with my new account, so Waqar Malik Whoever writes any commentary, your account will not be suspended again. It becomes okay according to the rules, but that is my but that account is “Waqar Malik Commentary,” the one I wrote; in it you can see that “the real Waqar Malik” is its username.
So, my fellow Pakistanis, I am telling you this because everywhere attacks are happening because there are only a few people like us; look at the rest. Everyone else’s statements are unacceptable because when I speak, it gets twisted. I don’t say establishment, okay, I don’t say Chaudhry, I don’t say Nizamuddin, okay, I tell you that these generals are doing this and the army is doing this; what more can I say? I can’t speak wrapped in such veils; they won’t let me.
It’s painful, and then what do they do? They invest money.
So much money is being invested—believe me, so much money is being poured in. It’s about suppressing it through the algorithm and another company Influencing it and saying that this person is talking completely wrong Spreading fake news first and making such statements Try it out; everyone who opposes the army or establishment everyone who opposes the army or establishment ends up in a mere struggle, I would say; look— the army plants cameras—even in judges’ chambers. If I were to say, Yes, they had installed a camera in the judge’s chamber; I heard this somewhere. Prove that we had installed it—how can I prove that?
But the judge has already spoken. The judges have said their piece, but it still cannot be proven that…
It was the same army that installed this camera, which is so powerful. The forces behind these crimes don’t leave evidence, so you know what they’re doing—how they stole the election. They tell you: “Tell us, where did they steal it?” Tell us, Asim Munir—where did they steal the election? How will they prove it now?
That’s why reporting such things is very difficult. What is this? They are reporting this as fake news by doing this. They are making false reports like this to get the channel suppressed.
Thousands of them have created accounts that are not bots. They have hired thousands of people and they have done it in other countries too. People were hired, and they have also hired teams in India, which is also true. I want to inform you today that teams have been hired in India who are normal humans who report to channels saying that this channel is not right.
This channel is spreading chaos and discord, and as a result, your channel gets suppressed on YouTube. This is happening on TikTok, this is happening on Facebook, this is happening everywhere. My Facebook average video used to go up to five or ten lakh views. It was going up to a million; now it barely reaches one lakh.
Sometimes it hits two lakh on Facebook because videos used to perform very well there. Everything is being suppressed everywhere, so the result of that… when you watch the video, be sure to post it in your WhatsApp groups with a caption written about this video, and definitely include anyone you feel is being suppressed, as they need your help because you are the ones who have to look into it. And let me tell you that if truthful journalism will remain and if you lose, then false journalism will win; this is up to you whether you want to promote true journalism or false journalism. You want to give the press an open ground.
God willing, we will meet again. May Allah be the protector and helper of you all; thank you all. Thank you very much for listening.
